Now Playing Tracks

mutualize:

MUTUALIZES POLAROID CAMERA GIVEAWAY

As you all know, i host a lot of giveaways and my last two recently ended. If you want proof that they were legit go here.

I am hosting this giveaway to celebrate reaching my goal of 30,000 followers. There will be 2 winners this time. AND THE WINNERS CAN CHOOSE WHICH COLOURED CAMERA THEY WANT.

The cameras come in BLUE or WHITE, or PINK or BLACK. Once the winners are picked, I will be ordering 2 cameras (in each winners preferred color) straight from eBay and then mailing it to the winners!

The image above is not mine, but it is an example of what the Polaroid cameras look like. I do not have them yet, I will order once the winners are picked so that they come in both winners preferred colour.

Here’s how this will work:

  • You have to be following meI am checking who is following, and the winner will be re-drawn if they aren’t following me. I post mainly photography photos anyway.
  • Likes do not count for anything, only reblogs will count.But you can still like it as a bookmark
  • Winner will be chosen like as if it were a raffle drawing. And will be contacted via tumblr messages.
  • You have until May 20th, 2014 (australian date) to reblog this post. If the winner doesnt reply within a week then I will choose different. I will post their URL on my blog too
  • This giveaway will be shipped to anywhere in the world, I will be paying for shipping so don’t worry. Good luck!

EACH WINNER GETS:

  • Fuji instax mini 8 polaroid camera. 
  • An arm strap
  • User manual
  • Mini white film x50
  • Photo album
  • Batteries

Ends on May 20th, 2014 (australian date)

—- REMEMBER, you must follow ME for your entry to count. —-

.*THIS IS NOT MY IMAGE, I FOUND IT ON GOOGLE*

And also, if you’d like to learn how to make some extra cash by testing out apps on your smartphone, click here and read the post. It will make you happy even if you dont win xx

Good luck and stay lovely!

freedominwickedness:

instigatinglittleshit:

little-missandry:

legion-of-leijon:

Being a nice guy and being a “nice guy”: Know the difference.

There is LITERALLY no difference.

Women don’t owe you shit. We are not sex objects. Too bad if you’re sad about it. You don’t deserve anybody. You are not entitled to another human being.

That’s just how it works.

HOLY SHIT WHAT

IT’S PERFECTLY NATURAL TO BE SAD WHEN SOMEONE YOU’RE INTERESTED IN DOESN’T WANT TO BE WITH YOU

Jesus fucking Christ that’s not entitlement, that’s totally normal disappointment. 

There’s a difference between the first and second pictures and if you can’t see it then holy fuck, I’m sorry about your failing vision. 

The difference is that the first version is being passive-aggressive and the second version is being aggressive, but BOTH of them are coming from the exact same point of view that they’re “supposed to” get the girl they want. Why is this even hard to see?

So at the risk of being crucified, I’m going to have to disagree. Neither is aggressive because there is no third party involved. It’s just a guy, by himself, expressing emotions. If there was another character or characters there, then that would be passive-aggressive or just aggressive. And if he’s alone, I personally don’t see anything wrong with either, although maybe he should reexamine a lot of things if his reaction is the latter. Haven’t you ever wanted something, and then not gotten it? Wanting something inherently induces the feeling of “I’m supposed to get it”. Name me a time that’s not true. Again, if these views were expressed outwardly to another person, this is a different story. It’s ok to feel angry or upset if some things don’t go your way. That is human. What you do with those feelings is the part all of you should be arguing about.

You may be thinking to yourself, “He’s talking to me! He is being (passive or not) aggressive to me.” Wrong.

The titles are This Is Ok, This Is Not Ok. Not I Am Ok/Not.

'This' implies a certain removed and objective look at a person, from an uninvolved perspective. And if you think the girl he wanted is there….well then we should be more concerned about why expresses at her in the third person.

Is there a nice way of letting people know they’re putting their agenda into something that’s not there?

Alright, gotta go. I see some women in need of my blatant, patriarchal oppressiveness over there.

Why Writers Are the Worst Procrastinators

writingbox:

Fantastic article on the psychology behind procrastinating, and why writers are particularly susceptible to it.

“Work finally begins,” says Alain de Botton, “when the fear of doing nothing exceeds the fear of doing it badly.” For people with an extremely fixed mind-set, that tipping point quite often never happens. They fear nothing so much as finding out that they never had what it takes.

To Tumblr, Love Pixel Union